November 2007 Civil Engineering Board Exam Invalidated
You can use our chatroom while waiting for exam results to kill your boredom.
The Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) invalidated the examination results in two subjects of the Civil Engineer Licensure Examinations conducted on November 17 and 18 due irregularities.
In PRC’s official announcement dated November 26, the commission voided the exam results of the Hydraulics and Geotechnical Engineering and Structural Engineering and Construction portions given by the Board of Civil Engineering.
“After evaluation of the examination result in the subject Hyrdaulics and Geotechnical Engineering, PRC finds the same to be “statistically improbable” considering the unusually high grade/rating obtained by examinees,” the PRC announcement said.
Meanwhile, the National Bureau of Investigation said it confiscated two mobile phones from two examinees. The PRC discovered that one of the two cellular phones contained answers to 30 exam questions. Of the 30 questions, 21 answers were found to be correct.
The irregularities in the exam results have been reported to Labor and Employment Secretary Arturo Brion who in turn lauded the immediate and decisive move of the PRC.
Reports said 4,782 examinees took the licensure examination in eight testing centers nationwide.
SOURCE: ABS-CBN News
70-291 enables the candidates to deal with the network services as well as resources for example messaging, database, Internet, intranet, isolated access, and client computer administration. 70-649 is related to the connectivity requirements for instance connecting branch offices as well as individual users in distant places to the company network and connecting enterprise networks to the Internet. 70-270 relates to the performance along with troubleshooting of a focused installation of Windows XP Professional. 646-204 is associated with the identification and the definition of, the components of, the functionality of, and the trade remunerations of Cisco IOS.
95 Comments, Comment or Ping
ana
I think the prc owe us a valid explanation for including geo/hydro set. Their reason of “statically improbable” was really unacceptable for us who reviewed so hard and expected that it was the only set which gives us the strength that we need only average scores for the 2 more sets… All examinees i think will agree to me that it was really an easy one. And why not include math/surveying set? Is it because that’s the most difficult one? Common that’s so unfair..
Everybody is affected..PRC reputation, Philippines reputations…and our CE Batch REPUTATIONS…
Nov 29th, 2007
MIGUEL CASTRO
Oo nga.. dapat yung nag cheat nalang e ipa retake.. bakit damay lahat? it’s so unfair…. bwisit talaga ang PRC bwisit!!!
Nov 29th, 2007
EAL
PRC, DO YOU HAVE A CONSCIENCE?
WHY RETAKING OUR EXAMS, FACE THE FACT THAT YOUR HYDRAU/GEO EXAM WAS SO EASY, AND DONT BE STUPID TO INVOLVE THE 4000 PLUS EXAMINEES WHO FAIRLY DID THEIR EXAM TO RETAKE JUST BECAUSE TWO EXAMINEES WERE CAUGHT CHEATING!! THAT ISNT FAIR!!!
Nov 29th, 2007
Venus
Last year was the nursing licensure scam… and now, the engineering scam.. yehey PRC. Ang galing mo talaga (Sarcasm)… Keep it up. Sunugin sana kayo.
Nov 29th, 2007
Aileen Simeon
Who passed the CE Board Exam?
Nov 29th, 2007
red
Is it not possible for examinees to get high rating???? Come to think about it…. we examinees have reviewed well,, most of us took this exam more than twice already and is just right to get a high a rating since it is every examinees aim…. Who should the PRC blame??? is it the examinees or the examiner??? the exam happens to be easy on our part for we have studied well, reviewed well, prepared well… If PRC is basing it only to past examination ratings, then that is unjust… Does the PRC mean that not all of us did our part and that only few should pass like the past exams? Maybe they are not happy that everyone will pass which is a very unprofessional attitude…. Anyway,,,, this is Philippines and this is what we are made of, when someone is successful then find a way to pull him down……. CIVIL ENGINEERS, we know what to do, let us rebuild our country,,, we must fight for what is right….. SALI NA TAYO KAY TRILLANES AT LIM…. WE’LL OCCUPY THE BUILDINGS OF PRC………
Nov 29th, 2007
red
MGA TAGA-PRC NA GUSTONG GUMAWA NG SCAM SA CIVIL ENGINEERING PROFESSION,,,, KAYO NA LANG SANA ANG PASABUGIN, MAMATAY NA KAYONG LAHAT,, MGA WALA KAYONG KUWENTA,, SARILI LANG NINYO ANG INISIP NINYO.
Nov 29th, 2007
kelly
PRC? my God!pls…pls…pls…it’s not possible to have highest grade in Geo subj.because this is easy one subj. even the examiner know bout that so why need to have retake. For God sake, we didnt cheat.We did do our best in order to pass the exam,why including those who are so innocent, those who study hard to retake?it’s sooo unfair. And if there’s a retake, why not including math,surv.why not all subjects?cause this subj.is difficult and so impossible to have highest grade?wow….retake is soo useless if math not included. Saludo kami sa inyu PRC,grabeee.Itaas ang bandila ng Pilipinas!
Nov 29th, 2007
red
The Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) invalidated the examination results in two subjects of the Civil Engineer Licensure Examinations conducted on November 17 and 18 due irregularities.
In PRC’s official announcement dated November 26, the commission voided the exam results of the Hydraulics and Geotechnical Engineering and Structural Engineering and Construction portions given by the Board of Civil Engineering.
“After evaluation of the examination result in the subject Hyrdaulics and Geotechnical Engineering, PRC finds the same to be “statistically improbable” considering the unusually high grade/rating obtained by examinees,” the PRC announcement said.
Meanwhile, the National Bureau of Investigation said it confiscated two mobile phones from two examinees. The PRC discovered that one of the two cellular phones contained answers to 30 exam questions. Of the 30 questions, 21 answers were found to be correct.
The irregularities in the exam results have been reported to Labor and Employment Secretary Arturo Brion who in turn lauded the immediate and decisive move of the PRC.
Reports said 4,782 examinees took the licensure examination in eight testing centers nationwide.
PAYAG BA KAYO SA KALOKOHAN NA ITO?????
Nov 29th, 2007
red
Secretary Arturo Brion
SUMANG-AYON KA NAMAN KAAGAD SA KALOKOHAN NG PRC EH WALA KA NAMAN KAALAM-ALAM SA EXAM NAMIN…. BAKIT KAYA HINDI NA LANG KAYO MAGTAWAG NG MGA PROFESSIONALS NA IREVIEW UNG EXAM BAGO KAYO GUMAWA NG WALANG KUWENTANG DESISYON,,,, HANAP KAYO SA MGA SCHOOLS AT HUWAG SA PRC….. GANUN DAPAT ANG GAWIN NG ISANG PROFESSIONAL BAGO SUMANG-AYON SA KALOKOHAN,,,,,
ARTURO BRION MAG-RESIGN KA NA DIN DAHIL ISA KA DIN NA WALANG KUWENTA!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nov 29th, 2007
mzojui
kawawa naman kami… mali ng iba kami ang ngsuffer… haaay
Nov 29th, 2007
nesh
How come you P.R.C. would say that it was statically improbable to have a high rating in geotechnical engineering???, Then it was also statically improbable to say the result of the november 2006 civil engineering board exam for there were many topnotcher who tied in various places!!!!,
1. The fault should be on you P.R.C. due to your negligence, it was clearly stated on your examinee’s guideline that cellphone is not allowed inside the examination room, your hiring stupid watchers who cannot implement rules and regulations.
2. Punishment must be only given to the 2 examineers who was caught cheating not the whole 4,780 left who took the exam…
Nov 29th, 2007
JANIE
A RETAKE DUE TO “STATISTICALLY IMPROBABLE RESULTS” IS TOTALLY OUTRAGEOUS!!! SINCE WHEN HAS DILIGENCE BEEN SYNONYMOUS TO DISHONESTY? PRC, I HOPE YOU’RE STILL LOOKING AT THE BIG PICTURE. THINK, THINK, THINK.
Nov 29th, 2007
nesh
Bakit retake pa ang gusto nyo P.R.C. d gawin nyo nalang na sa May 2008 ang next board exam ng mga nagtake ng november 2007 civil board exam para mas maganda atleast cguro naman ung mga revieweers ay Ph.D level na sila sa mga subjects na ibibigay nyong exam para naman hinda maging statically improbable pag madami ang topnnotchers at mataas ang passing rate, in short chicken ung mga exam questions niyo dba??, Kung ang gusto niyo ay makipaglokohan d cge karma karma lang naman yan, sana nga kayo ang sumunod na pasabugin para magising naman kayo!!!!!
Nov 29th, 2007
nesh
Baka GAWAIN nung mga board of examineers ang gumamit ng leakage or cheating strategies whatever you may call it kaya alam nila kung may gumamit ng leakage o nag cheat kase mataas ang result ng geotechnical and hydraulics exam, ayaw nilang masapawan sa pag gamit ng cheating strategies,he,he,
bato bato sa langit sana umulan ng apoy sa P.R.C.,,,
Nov 29th, 2007
red
ACTS OF CHEATING (Use of codigos, cellular phones, beepers, programmable calculators, communication with anyone by means of words, signs, gestures, codes, and similar acts.
—————-CANCELLATION of examination papers and suspension for two (2) years…..
MGA TAGA-PRC HINDI MARUNONG MAGBASA,,, BAKIT KAYA RETAKE NA ANG CONSEQUENCE NG CHEATING….. EH MALINAW NAMAN SIGURO NA SINABI NILA NA CANCELLATION OF EXAMINATION PAPERS AND SUSPENSION FOR TWO YEARS ANG PARA SA OFFENSE NA CHEATING AT PARA LAMANG DIN SA MGA CHEATERS….. HAAY,,, DAPAT SIGURO PALITAN NILA UNG INSTRUCTIONS NILA….. DAPAT SIGURO GANITO…. INVALIDATION OF EXAM if there are 70% or higher national passing rate… A RETAKE must take place to all examinees if someone is caught CHEATING.. GANUN NA LANG DAPAT SIGURO PARA HINDI NA TAYO NAG-IISIP PA KUNG BAKIT MAY RETAKE……..
Nov 29th, 2007
gambit_1925
PRC, nakakapanginig kau ng laman!!! Nkakahiya kau!!! Naturingan p nman kaung mga professionals!!!
Hndi nyo b alam na npka mura n ng mga isip ng mga examinees prior to their exams?? At alam nyo rin bng khit kela, npakamahal ng utak nyo??
Alam nyo b PRC kng Bkit??
Dhl, HND NINYO GNAGAMIT ANG UTAK NYO!!!
Masunog sna ang mga kaluluwa ninyo!!!
Nov 29th, 2007
red
http://philippineboardexamresults.blogspot.com/
magvote kayo dito
Nov 29th, 2007
NO_NAME
ANG GANDA NAMAN NG TIMING NI SEN. TRILLANES. PARANG DI NA MABIGYAN NG PANSIN NI PRES. GLORIA ANG PETITION NAMIN NA NO RETAKE. ALALA NA SI PRES. GLORIA NGAYON SA STABILITY LEADERSHIP NIYA. :(
GRRRR. BWISIT KA TRILLANES!!!
Nov 29th, 2007
gorio
PUTANG INA NYO PRC!!!!!
Nov 29th, 2007
ARTURO BRION
no comment
Nov 29th, 2007
cheater_hater
yung mga nag bubwesit sa PRC… siguradong sigurado ako may leakege clang nakuha. lalong lalo na c RED at KELLY! wow.. kay sila mismo nag hihinayang.. kasi may leakege na cla. hayyyy! kapal mukha nyo. kapal talaga.. kapal… i think d decision of PRC is Fair enough. for me.
Nov 29th, 2007
cheater_hater
kaya tigilan nyo na ang kung anu mang cnasabi nyo sa prc….
Nov 29th, 2007
prc
oo nga oo nga!
Nov 29th, 2007
ana
hui cheater hater are u nuts???!!! saludo aq ky red kun cnu man xa…maybe ur just 1 of the so called “chu chu ng PRC”!!
sau lng nging fair yan! ndi nq magtataka kung sangayon k s dcxon ng PRC.. malamang kung ngexam k din alm mu na sa sarili mong BAGSAK k!! thats y u really need to retake…tsk tsk
Nov 29th, 2007
Danica
super unfair…kasalanan ba namin kung mataas ang nakuha naming grade sa hydro????? Naiinis ako kasi pinaghirapan ko yun tapos ganon lang mangyayari paparetake lang pala. And also if magpaparetake sila, dapat lahat ng subjects na lang kasi wawa naman yung mga bimagsak sa math parang la na sila pag-asa. Saka sino ba yung 2 nahuli?? Dapat sila lang yung managot.
Nov 29th, 2007
C.E-vil Board
pano yn, mgrereview ulit ung mga examinees… tpos cympre mas mamamaster n nila ulit ung mga subjects na ireretake… edi mas lalong mataas ang makuha nila! baka naman kwestyunin p ninyo un.. utang na loob.. ayusin nyo buhay nyo prc..
Nov 29th, 2007
Hongkong OFW
TO ALL PRC STAFF,MY CONSCIENCE BA KAU?KUNG 2 LANG TAO ANG NAGCHEAT BUT DAMAY LAHAT,,YOU KNOW WHAT WE OFW WORKERS ARE SACRIFICING WORKING ABROAD JUST TO EDUCATE OUR CHILDREN,,TUITION ARE TOO..EXPENSIVE,REVIEWING IS TOO HARD FOR THE STUDENT..AND NOW WHAT IS THE RESULT?IF THE 2 PERSON ENVOLVED IN THAT MATTER SILA NA LANG ANG MAG EXAM…YOU ARE SO IDIOT PRC,STUPID WALANG PUSO.MAAWA NAMAN KAU SA MGA STUDANTE.YOU ARE TOO SELFISH PRC!BAKA KAILANGAN PA NINYO ANG PASOK2 PERO SABIHIN NAMIN ANG TOO WALA KAMING PERA,KAYONG MGA MUKHANG PERA…
Nov 29th, 2007
Hongkong OFW
TO ALL PRC STAFF,MY CONSCIENCE BA KAU?KUNG 2 LANG TAO ANG NAGCHEAT BUT DAMAY LAHAT,,YOU KNOW WHAT WE OFW WORKERS ARE SACRIFICING WORKING ABROAD JUST TO EDUCATE OUR CHILDREN,,TUITION ARE TOO..EXPENSIVE,REVIEWING IS TOO HARD FOR THE STUDENT..AND NOW WHAT IS THE RESULT?IF THE 2 PERSON ENVOLVED IN THAT MATTER SILA NA LANG ANG MAG EXAM…YOU ARE SO IDIOT PRC,STUPID WALANG PUSO.MAAWA NAMAN KAU SA MGA STUDANTE.YOU ARE TOO SELFISH PRC!BAKA KAILANGAN PA NINYO ANG PASOK2 PERO SABIHIN NAMIN ANG TOO WALA KAMING PERA,KAYONG MGA MUKHANG PERA…gising prc
Nov 29th, 2007
winny
Hoy cheater hater!stupid ka talaga,,nagpapalakas ka sa PRC anoh?hoy akala mo ha kahit anak ka ng presidente wala kaming pakialam..parehong tao lang tayo….kayong taga prc idiot talaga kau,,maliwanag nga na nakita nila ang 2 tao na nagcheat bakit d nyo parusahan cla..damay lahat….sayang lang pinag aral namin.nag sacrifice pa kami na mag study..puyat gabi2 tapos ngaun?buwesit..at yong 2 na nagcheat walang hiya kau!stupid kau…….PRC wake up
Nov 29th, 2007
mark
walang kuwentang prc yan!!!!ang daming nadamay sa kalukuhang yan………
Nov 29th, 2007
.........
PRC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
KAYO ANG MAY KASALANAN KUNG BAKIT MAY LEAKAGE!!!!
KAYO ANG NAGBIGAY NG LEAKAGE SA 2 STUDENTS!!!!
KAYO LANG ANG MAY ACCESS SA MGA QUESTIONS!!!!!
ALANGAN NMAN YUNG EXAMINER ANG NAGBIGAY NUN!!!!
BAKIT KMI ANG MAG-SUSUFER???
ANG TANGA-TANGA NYO KASI MAGBIGAY NG LEAKAGE, D KAYO NAG-IINGAT KAYA NABUKO TULOY KAYO!!!
TAPOS SA AMIN NYO ISISISI ANG NANGYARI?
HA? USE COMMON SENSE PRC!!!!!!!
EDUCATED KAYO D BA?
D NMAN KAYO GRADE 1 PRA MAG-ISIP NG GANYAN!!!
Nov 29th, 2007
bob-o?'di no!!!!!
to prc…it’s unfair..how about us..we’re studying hard just to pass the board for us to help our families…well, its just easy for you to declare “Retake” as easy as picking up scattered money in your very own office premises…but with us, it’s hard, kayo kaya mag review for six months at gaganyanin lang ang result!?
bakit nyo lalahatin eh dalawa lang ang nagcheat, kaya nga naghire kayo ng mga proctor para magbantay,para manghuli ng nagcheat…may nahuli nga, pero nahuli ba kaming lahat na nagcheat?, DALAWA lang…sila nalang paparusahan nyo. hwag lahat…and with regards to your statistically improbable result, kasalanan ba naming (ipinanganak kaming matatalino?! )easy lang ang exam ‘yong ibinigay?(blame it to the examiner) at marami pang bonus…(baka kayong bob-o)
pag iisipan nyo naman…
filipino kami at hindi kami mga bob-o….okey!!!
Nov 29th, 2007
LAGOT_NA_KO_HA
Yawa mong taga prc! Maypag kumunista atong gobyerno para una mo ma execute! Lowlives!
Nov 29th, 2007
Liz Basiuang
PRC staff,
It’s really annoying that the decision has been made without further investigations… fault of 2 people is not for all… strictly follow the regulations you imposed in taking exams. I’m sure the examinees did their best that’s why they got high scores in hydraulics,geothecnicl engineering and structural design, THEY REVIEWED WELL that’s why there is what we call a review or refresh which they spent much of their money and effort. I spent almost 2oothousand pesos for 6 months..tha’ts including food, board, fare, and hired somebody to do the H. chores so it’s more focus on the review. Think about too! If u want a retake, why not all subjects? it’s not really fair…
Nov 30th, 2007
Clark
Ang masabi ko lang sa PRC dapat sila palitan na iyan dahil walang naidudulot sa pilipino citizen at sa lahat ng examinees, puro lang may problem sila. dahil sila mismo nag bibigay ng anomalies dyan. dapat mag born again na kayong lahat na PRC.
Nov 30th, 2007
Kurt
I’m very disappointed about why this happened to the CE board. This is downgrading to CE profession. I believe a thorough investigation should be done among the people inside PRC. Leakage won’t be possible without their participation. Don’t make the students suffer due to your negligence. Think about the TIME, MONEY and EFFORT they gave(excluding the cheaters - caught and uncaught) for their review and exam.
This needs a sound solution for the benefit of examinees.
Nov 30th, 2007
Clarisse
kapag wala pa ring aksyon na nangyari from concerned parties (PRC, PICE, RI, Padilla, etc. ) i think it’s time na para palakahin ang issue..by monday, i will personally go to media to report this issue and i’m hoping to make all the legal necessary actions to undo the retake announcement.. I’M WARNING YOU PRC ESPECIALLY DR. LAZARO, naku, di ko alam kung saan ka dadamputin after maresolve tong issue na ito together with the NBI, SEC. BRION, and others who approved this stupid retake..itago nyo sa bato kahit na sa diamond pa, no retake will be held..or else, boycott ang retake! ONCE YOU AGREE
Nov 30th, 2007
Clarisse
kapag wala pa ring aksyon na nangyari from concerned parties (PRC, PICE, RI, Padilla, etc. ) i think it’s time na para palakahin ang issue..by monday, i will personally go to media to report this issue and i’m hoping to make all the legal necessary actions to undo the retake announcement.. I’M WARNING YOU PRC ESPECIALLY DR. LAZARO, naku, di ko alam kung saan ka dadamputin after maresolve tong issue na ito together with the NBI, SEC. BRION, and others who approved this stupid retake..itago nyo sa bato kahit na sa diamond pa, no retake will be held..or else, boycott ang retake! ONCE YOU AGREE AND ACCEPT TO TAKE THE RETAKE, IT MEANS NA INAAMIN NYO NA IRREGULARITY O ABNORMAL ANG PAGKAKUHA NYO NG MATAAS NA MARKA SA HYDRAUILCS AT KASALANAN NATENG LAHAT ANG PERSONAL CHEATING DONE BY TWO STUDENTS.. im telling you guyz, ok lang sana sa aking ang retake kung may concrete reasons pero with such irregularities they presented to us, BULLSHIT!
Nov 30th, 2007
yami
wala namang magbabago kahit magmura kayo dian ng walang katapusan or manisi ng kung sino sino. nilabas nila ung desisyon na un na inaakala nilang tama. unfair kung sa unfair pero may magagawa pa ba tayo aside from retaking the exam? we don’t have that kind of power, to change and fight what has been decided for us.. all we can do is try our best in this so called “retake” and prove to them, to PRC, and to other concerned bodies that we can pass their exam.. let’s all do our best.. good luck!!
Nov 30th, 2007
concernctzen
khit sa mata ng Diyos ang me kasalanan lang ang dapat na maparusahan nde ang buong bayan, maawa naman kayo sa mga taong nagpakahirap para sa exam na to, bakit kelangan ba mababa parati result? what are you tryinng to prove? that the civil engineering examinees are dim-witted? such impressive exam results imply good teaching and study methods we should be proud of them(examinees) because they’ve done their part… so do yours…. kayo ata dpat magretake… what do you think?
Nov 30th, 2007
fcuk off cheater_hater and PRC
CHEATER_HATER and PRC, wow naman loyalista ng PRC, mga kamag-anak nyo sigurado empleyado sa PRC at depensa agad ang drama nyo! And you had the guts to accuse Red and Kelly of cheating? Hahahaha! you are one helluva sucker! Did you even take the exam or are you even civil engineering graduates, huh CHEATER_HATER? I don’t think so, because if you are, you wouldn’t be defending PRC’s decision. No one in his or her right mind would think that the stupid decision to re-take the exam is fair. Just because they caught 2 cheaters (with only 21 correct answers out of 30 questions? barely passing rate) and a lot of the examinees got good ratings in the other two subjects, PRC would readily assume there had been a leakage in the exam?! c’mon, that’s CRAP! CHEATER_HATER and PRC, do you even know what “statistically improbable” means? PRC doesn’t even have the BALLS to show their faces and explain why they came up with the “re-take exam” decision on live TV and yet you based everything on statistics? Stupid dumbasses! That include you CHEATER_HATER.. fuck yourself off!
Nov 30th, 2007
fcuk off cheater_hater and PRC
Go people! don’t let those morons bring you down. As soon as we get our licenses, let’s hop on the first flight to Dubai, Singapore, US, wherever as long as it’s not in this god forsaken country.. and be the BEST CIVIL ENGINEERS there. I love the Philippines but it’s the morons here that make people want to leave. PRC, one day you’ll regret you’ve ever made this stupid decision.. and we’ll be in la la land earning more dollars than you can count.
Nov 30th, 2007
ECEfoxtrot
if der r 2 examinees caught with cellfones with them, and the cellfones contain 21 correct answers out of 30, dis could only mean 1 ting. MERONG LEAKAGE. nde lang un sa 2 na nahuli. obvious lang ung praan nla ng pagccheat. kc nagleak n nga cla, nagdla p cla ng fone sa loob ng examination room. pero gaya ng sabi ku, mlaking ang probablty n nde lang sa kanila n-share ang leak. w/c is very obvious. but in any way, walng may kaslanan ne2 kundi ang prc. dey dont knw how 2 run their system. or sinsdya n tlaga nla. imagne, panu nagkaroon ng cphone sa loob ng exam rum in exam hours n nde nllman ng watchrs? panu nagkaroon ng leakage? wawa nmn ung nag-aral with all honesty. by the way, the rules clearly states that whosoever wil be found cheating in any way, his exam will be invalidated and will not be allowed to take future examinations. dis shud b true to the 2 pipol na nahuli nanddaya. if ders no much evidence dt wud prove the guilt of the others, nde applcable ito. wla rin s rules n dpat ay magretake kpg may gni2ng pngyyri espcially the “improbable high grades” is not a gud evidence dt justifies dt der is ndeed a leakage, bcz dis is very possble to happen. now, pagpalagay na i2 ay mbigat n ebidensiya, e wag n “nla pagtake for future examinations ang batch n e2″ dahil ibg sabhn lang ne2 n “NANDAYA CLANG LAHT”.
ang problema lang, sino2x ung guilty? lahat ba? lahat b nandaya? dey shud b particular kung cno2x. dahil pag may ndamay cla, dt is not fair. kung ganun sbihin n lang ng prc “NANDAYA CLANG LAHAT”.
pero para idetermine kung cno2x nga b tlga ang nandaya, jan ppsok ang retake to prove hu are worthy.
haaay…. in hir comes torture on the part of the examinees, especially to those hu have honestly reviewed ang took the exam.
the blame shud all be on the PRC. dis is all their fault!
gudlak n lng 2 my fellow engineers. anyway, if you tink uv made it fair and square on the first exam, kkyanin nyu ult yan on the second. once u hav d instinct, it will never go away. so gudlak n lng. saka nyu n sumpain ang PRC pagktpos. howevr, if der is any way that you cud stop dis legally accdg to wat u thot is ryt, its up 2u.
Godspeed.
Nov 30th, 2007
Chris
NO to RETAKE!
PRC is very irresponsible.
Remember the error they made in the Hydro/Geotech exam - 3 points BONUS yun. And the said exam was not that difficult. And if they are blaming the very good performance of the examinees on the said subjects, that is totally pathetic and only shows the crab mentality of some people in PRC. Everybody has a chance of getting a good mark, and obtaining such should not be “invalidated”… it should even be PRAISED!
Another point… PRC should be seriously STRICT on their rules. If someone slipped in a cellphone on his possession, then it’s PRC’s fault for failing to check properly the examinees. And it goes to show that they are not as serious as the honest examinees in following rules!
Merong tinatago ang PRC sa iskandalong ito. Napakababaw ng dahilan kung dahil lamang sa mataas na grado at sa 2 “cheaters”, ay magreretake ang ilang libong examinees na nag-aral para dito. Nasayang ang ORAS namin. Dapat ngayon may trabaho na kami. Pero ano nangyari? Isang buwan kaming mag-aaral para lamang paghandaan ang isang (retake) na exam na hindi namin karapat-dapat na kunin.
WE DON’T DESERVE THIS, GUYS!
WE SHOULD MAKE A MOVE AGAINST THIS UNFAIR DECISION!
Nov 30th, 2007
jhai geonzon
good morning to all… i was kinda surprised how strict the prc is to the other examinees.. we just had our board exam last august.. but i found most of the proctors were not that strict… there were very many who did not follow the given instructions… many did not wear white shirts, have brought their fones with higher levels of volume( that really distracted us), wear slippers, ot monggol 2pencils… ut still they were able to take the given exam,,,,..even proctors kept on chatting with each other… trying to compare the 2 board exams, ewan ko nalang….lahat naman siguro nang board may leakage…what do you think?
Nov 30th, 2007
Chris
Kung may leakage, mas kahihiyan ng PRC yan dahil sa kanila nanggagaling ang mga exam questions.
Nakakahiya.
Nov 30th, 2007
Chris
May mga plano ba ng rally regarding this issue? Anong balak ng mga against dito sa RETAKE issue na ito?
Nov 30th, 2007
thorsz
mga bro!!! ano kaya if hindi tayo mag retake, idaan nlang natin sa kalsada!!!!!!!
Nov 30th, 2007
Chris
Dapat kahit 1 day may SHOW of FORCE sa PRC.
Para makakuha tayo ng attention.
Nov 30th, 2007
opaw
unsay a2ng buha2n? mag meting t para magka1 kta!! dli t mosogot sa retake!! gago man ning taga PRC!! sayop b na2 na makakoha t ug dako nga score!!! hoyyyyyy!! mga taga UM unsa plano ta????
Nov 30th, 2007
Chris
Anonymous said…
Sa aking mga kasamang CE,
Ang pinalabas ng PRC na advisory ay isang insulto, at isang malaking panloloko upang mapagtakpan lamang ang kanilang kamalian. Bakit ko nasabi? Nais ko sanang ipaliwanang.
Unang una ang statement na “Sobrang taas ng score sa Hydro at Design”.
Kung ating iisipin, iniinsulto ang kakayahan natin ng pagsagot ng mga problema sa board exam ng statement na ito… bakit?
Kailan pa naging mali ang magkaroon ng madaming mataas na score? Kung ganoon ba dapat ba na walang makasagot ng exam nila para masabing “VALID” ito? Kung ganoon pala, ano pa ang silbi ng pag-aaral natin kung nakadisenyo din pala ang exam na ito para hindi tayo “MAKAKUHA NG MATAAS NA SCORE”. Kahit saan natin tingnan WALA SA ATIN ANG KAMALIAN DAHIL IBINIGAY NILA ANG EXAM, AT SINAGUTAN NATIN. MADAMING MATAAS ANG SCORE HINDI BA TAMA LANG NA SABIHIN NILANG “MAHUSAY ANG KINALABASAN” AT HINDI SABIHING “MALAMANG AY MAY DAYAAN”?
Anong klaseng pag-iisip o kaisipan yan?
Pangalawa, “Dalawa sa mga nag take ang nahulihan ng cellphone”
Oo isang malaking possibility ito, pero nakasaad sa guidelines ng PRC ay: “KUNG MAY MAHULIHAN NG CELLPHONE AUTOMATIC NA BAGSAK NA SILA AT KAILANMAN AY DI NA MAKAKA TAKE NG EXAM”. Mga kasama, wag tayong magpadala sa emosyon. Kung makikita nyo ang statement na ito, at aanalisahin, makikita nyong pinapalabas nilang dahil sa dalawang yun ay kailangan nating mag retake? ulitin nyo ang pagbasa sa huling sentence ko… Mali hindi ba? Contradicting na sa unang pahayag sa GUIDELINES nila, bukod dito, dalawa yun sa 3,000 o mas madami pang nag take ng board exam sa buong Pilipinas, kailan naging FACTOR ang DALAWA sa TATLONG LIBO O MAS MADAMI PA?
Ang tanging ginawa nila dito ay makuha ang emosyon natin at may mapagbalingan ng galit.
Magand ang strategy, pero CIVIL ENGINEER TAYO, MARUNONG TAYO MAG-ANALYZE. Wag tayong magpadala sa emosyon natin, pagaralan ang mga bagay bagay. Mali ang pangalawang statement na ito, bukod pa dito, malaki ang pakiramdam ko na gawa gawa lamang nila ito upang masabi nating “oo kailangan nating mag retake dahil sa dalawang yun…” Kita nyo na?
Ang masasabi ko, HINDI TAYO ***** PARA MANIWALA.
Uulit ulitin ko, hindi na tayo grade one at HINDI KAILAN MAN NAGING GROUP EFFORT ANG BOARD EXAM, KUNG DALAWA LANG ANG NAHULI NILA, WALA SILANG KARAPATAN NA I-DEPRIVE ANG MAS NAKAKARAMI SA TAMA LAMANG AT PINAGHIRAPAN NA SA ATIN. HINDI ITO CASE NG KASALANAN NG ISA, KASALANAN NG LAHAT.
Kahit sa korte natin pag usapan ito, siguradong panalo tayo.
Mga kaibigan, at kasamang CE, huwag payagan ito, hindi kailanman natin naging kasalanan ang kamalian ng mga examiners. Kung madali ang binigay na exam, sila ang dapat magsisihan. Hindi dapat ibato sa atin ang kamalian at I-MISLEAD ang emosyon natin sa pagsasabi ng kung ano ano pang explination para lamang mag-retake tayo.
Wag magpadala sa emosyon at matutuhan ang salitang “READ BETWEEN THE LINES” Engineer tayo, hindi tayo mangmang na tao na sasang ayon lamang sa kung ano ang sabihin sa atin, dahil may kakayahan tayong mag-isip.
I-analyze nyo ng mabuti ang statement ng PRC na iyan at madami kayong makikitang butas. Ang mga nakita ko ay konti o maliit lamang sa maaring makita ng mas madami. Hanapin natin ang katotohanan at huwag payagan ang pang-iinsultong ito.
Sana’y ipakalat natin ang sulat na ito sa mga site, blogs o e-mail sa ating mga kapatid na CE para mabuksan din ang kanilang kaisipan sa mga nangyayaring maaring hindi rin nila nauunawa an… Gawin nating isa ang ating galaw upang mas malakas at mas malawak ang ating mga magiging pagkilos.
Marami ng salamat sa inyong pagbabasa at patnubayan tayo ng Maykapal.
November 27, 2007 10:30 PM
Nov 30th, 2007
GYRL
tama ka CLARISSE, i think its time that we do something. im sure if the media knows about this, people will agree and sympathize with us kase tayo naman talaga ang tama (kahit saan angulo mo tingnan) hindi nga nila (PRC) pinalaki masyado ang issue dba when they reported it to manila times, kase, alam nila, sila ang mapapahiya…unlike sa nursing exams, when they had concrete evidence that there really was a leakage…grabe amg laki nun na balita..kaya nga i think we should take this to court, alam kong tayo ang panalo…kase if we just keep quiet about this, parang tinanggap na rin natin na tayo ang may sala kaya we would just retake the exam.. kaya let’s go and fight for what is RIGHT….SUGOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nov 30th, 2007
RED
CHEATER HATER
NAKUHA MO NA BA UNG SHARE MO SA IBINAYAD SA PRC PARA MAGLABAS NG LEAKAGE……… SABIHIN MO LANG KUNG DODOBLEHIN KO PARA SUMAMA KA SA AMIN LABAN SA PRC…. KUNG AYAW MO NAMAN TUMAHIMIK KA NA LANG,,, WALA KA NAMANG MAITUTULONG EH………..
SHUUUUUUUUUUUUTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT UUUUUPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nov 30th, 2007
kaiser
kung meron mang irregularities na nangyari,”……”dpat ang cchin dyan!!!! una…. bakit kelangan idamay lahat!!!!!! kapabayaan ng “……..” !!!!! at hindi ininspect mabuti ung gamit….. cellphone lng pinalusot pa na pwedeng gamitin bilang cheating medium ng mga walang kwentang estudyante… sabagay in courtesy of mr. eric bischoff of wwe, controversy creates cash….
Nov 30th, 2007
RED
ITS FRIDAY ALREADY,,,,,
PLEASE DON’T LOSE HOPE,,, WE WILL HAVE OUR RIGHT BE HEARD BY THE WHOLE COUNTRY IF THE DECISION OF THE PRC WON’T BE LIFTED TODAY….. EVERYBODY MUST COOPERATE FOR IT IS OUR FUTURE AND RIGHT THAT WE MUST FIGHT FOR…
GOD BLESS US ALL
Nov 30th, 2007
kaiser
at ngayon sa naglabas ng leakage NA tinext pa ng CHEATER HATER NA KUMAG NA AYAW PA UMAMIN, IN COURTESY OF DONOVAN’S FAVORITE LINE…… YAMINIKAIRE…… TANONG MU NA LANG SA MGA JAPANESE KUNG ANU IBIG SABIHIN NUN!!!!!!! PAKITEXT NA LANG AH!!!!!!!! HEHEHE!!!!!!!!
Nov 30th, 2007
Concerning of ol
DI BA ANG CE MGA BRIGHT SO IPAGLABAN NYO ANG NARARAPAT SO GO NA KAYO WAG NYONG HAYAAN NA GANUN NLANG ANG MANGYARI FOR ALL THOSE 5 YEARS PINAGHIRAPAN NYO MAG ARAL TAPOS GANUN NALANG ANG MANGYARI SO UNFAIR IPAGLABAN AND TAMA AT KUNG ANO ANG NARARAPAT..
AT SANA ANG PRC FOLLOW WHAT THEIR RULES AND BEING A FILIPINO AND AS A HUMAN TOO..
ANG MG RETAKE YUNG TAONG NAG CHEAT LANG WAG IDAMAY ANG IBA!!!!
SHITTTTTTTT KAYO PRC MGA HINAMPAK MO!!! YAWA PESTI MO!!
Nov 30th, 2007
Concerning of ol
P——–PANUWAY
R——–RA
C——–CAAYO MO
Nov 30th, 2007
faustin
aww.. so bad for those who fairly did the exam…..
nway.. if you guys did it the last time.. im sure you can do it again right!
just have faith!
Nov 30th, 2007
Chris
I wonder if the case will be settled immediately if legal means is pursued. Baka tapos na yung retake, naghi-hearing pa rin.
There should be a faster way for this issue to be settled. We couldn’t just sit here and wait for a legal procedure to get done.
May grupo ba na gumagalaw tungkol dito?
Nov 30th, 2007
Burning_Ass
PRC! Leche kayo! Wala ba kaming karapatan na perpekin exam nu? E andali ng exam nu e! Karamihan ng mga tanong dun pabalik balik lang from the past board exams. Yung issue sa Design! Bakit pati kami damay lahat? Kung may magretake man, yung sa mga lugar na nahulihan lang ng pandaraya. WALA KAMING NAPAKINABANGANG LEAKAGE KAYA WAG NYO KAMING IDAMAY SA MGA KATARANTADUHANG GINAWA NG IBA! Napakawalang basehan ng mga reasons nyo! Hindi nyo inisip gastos at pagod namin. May mga pamilya kaming dapat pang suportahan, and we need our license to find job! Leche kayong lahat! Tama lang nagpupunta tayong abroad mga engineers! Bulok na talaga tong PILIPINAS! At nagsisimula yan sa PRC! PRC BULOK! TAE KAYO!
Nov 30th, 2007
EAL
ATTENTION GUYS,
NAGKARON NG MEETING SA R.I. KANINA, MAY NAGPUNTA N KAHAPON N TAGA PRC AT SABI NILA, “RETAKE ALL” LANG DAW ANG PWEDENG IBIGAY NILA SATEN, BUT ACCORDING SA MGA LEADERS FROM DIFFERENT SCHOOLS NA NAGSIMULA NG GUMAWA NG PETITION, MALAKI DAW ANG LABAN NATEN FOR “NO RETAKE AT ALL”
SANA LNG TOTOO, KC HINDI NATEN HAWAK ANG ORAS
Nov 30th, 2007
acelle
napaka inconsiderate nyo talaga!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ano magagawa nyo kung talagang matataas ang nakuha nilang rating damay ng lahat eh dalawa lang naman ang nakita nyo and besides totoo kayang may nakita o gawa-gawa nyo lang yan. di nyo lang alam kung gaano ang pagsusumikap ng kapatid ko para lang makapasa. lam nyo bang ilang novena ang tinapos nya at ng nanay ko. napahiya siguro kayo dahil nasagot ng mga examinees ang mga questions kasi naman kahit anong professional board exam ang binibigay ng PRC parang ayaw nilang may pumasa kaya ngayong mataas ang rating ng mga batch ng mga CE eh di sila makapaniwala. lam ko na may mga anak din kayo sana lang di mangyari sa kanila ang ganito. magisip-isip kayo sa ginawa nyo.
Nov 30th, 2007
Undertaker
…………………/´¯/)
……………….,/¯../
………………/…./ Mga Examiners shove this
…………./´¯/’…’/´¯’·¸ into YouR Asses!!
………./’/../…../….. /¨¯\
……..(’(…´…´… ¯~/’…’) Mga Incompetent Kayo
………\……………..’…// GAGO GAGO GAGO!!!
……….’\'…\……… _.·´
…………\………….( Hoy GAGO kayo!!!
…………..\…………\
Nov 30th, 2007
Undertaker
**********************************************************
…………………/´¯/)
……………….,/¯../
………………/…./ Mga Examiners shove this
…………./´¯/’…’/´¯’·¸ into YouR Fat Asses!!
………./’/../…../….. /¨¯\
……..(’(…´…´… ¯~/’…’) Mga Incompetent Kayo
………\……………..’…// GAGO GAGO GAGO!!!
……….’\’…\……… _.·´
…………\………….( Hoy GAGO kayo!!!
…………..\…………\
**********************************************************
Nov 30th, 2007
jamez
don’t lose hope… and pray lang tau.. and have faith n god…(para sa mga taong nag take nang exam na maayos at walang daya)..
Nov 30th, 2007
Reindahl Opyana
OFW-KSA
Ano ba naman yan taga PRC. Noon kami ang biktima ng pagka-profesionals niyo, ngayon mga kapatid namin ang nabiktima. One of the examinee for this board exam is my brother.
Bakit naman ganyan taga PRC. Buti pa yung ibang profesionals jan at pera lang ang ninanakaw pero kayo profesions!!!!!!!! Profesion ang ninanakaw niyo. Tingin ng bayan sa iyo Profesionals (kuno wha wha wha)
5 years na paghihirap and the pressure to revieew just to pass that examination. Mga taga PRC, wala ba kayong consensya?????
Naku po, kung ganyan ganyan ang nangyayari, tangalin niyo na lang ang Board Examination para sa ibang bansa na lang kukuha ng lisensya.
Mga examinee, mura lang naman ang Profesional ID Card. sa RECTO University pwede doon he he he.
Sana maawa naman mga taga PRC. sana kunin kayo ni satanas he he he
Nov 30th, 2007
josh
prc,
mga bobo kayo eh… alam nyo nman na my magchecheat bakit kau nagpabaya, ngaun kasalananpa ng mga examinees.. wala kaung mga puso, icpin nyo nman ung mga diserving na mga students… wala kaung basihan na convincing!!!! sana bigyan nyo ng solution e2 agad……..
Nov 30th, 2007
WatThe....
Grabe wala n po bng karapatn n
mkakuha ng mataas na iskor…
wala n po snbi n pag may nhuli isa
damay lhat…
kung may leakage man yun dalawa
ksalnn nyo yan..
imbestighn nyo mga tao nyo sa PRC..
san inyo galing yan…
Gumgawa kyo ng paraan para maklusot
Sinisira nyo pati pangnln ng
Civil Engineering At Bansa Ntin…
Nov 30th, 2007
improbable
GUYS!!!
yung results improbable daw!! akalain nyo??
i diffinitely disagree bout that stupid retake…
can we call our lawyers???
PRC…
are u not aware of what this batch is capable of..??
MATATALINO KAMI… WALANG BOBO SA’MIN!!!
we are capable of rebuilding this country and we hope to start it with you,PRC kayo!!!
gets nyo… ???
you know what? PRC dito sa Cebu is so strict kahit panyo namin pinapasok pa sa plastic envelop… kamay ko basang basa… i cant imagine pano nakalusot yung dalawang me celfon!!?? hmmp…
Nov 30th, 2007
ako yung ngcheat
sori…
Nov 30th, 2007
ako yung ngcheat
kala ko kc maku2ha ko na license ko!!
Nov 30th, 2007
jehzlau
PRC SUCKS PRC SUCKS PRC REALLY SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nov 30th, 2007
Chris
Kawawa naman yung nag-cheat saka yung mga kasali sa dayaan na ito - PRC etc.. Katakot takot na KARMA aabutin niyo.
Nov 30th, 2007
Chris
BOYCOTT ANG RETAKE KUNG HINDI MAG-I-ISSUE NG MATINONG DAHILAN ANG PRC NA YAN PARA MAG-RETAKE ANG MGA EXAMINEES!
Nov 30th, 2007
kai
I’m just wondering, what is wrong in hydro/geo? Madali lang talaga yun eh,kahit di ka magreview ng sobra, papasa ka pa rin….in fact you can do trial and error..unlike sa math,kahit i-trial and error mo pa,wala talaga…magaling kasi examiner eh…basang-basa ang mga examinees. Why not admit to yourself (to the examiner) that your exam in hydro/geo was so easy…?! Wasn’t that acceptable? Aren’t you proud that this generation of civil engineers are more intelligent?
Nov 30th, 2007
kai
To the Board of Civil engineers and PRC, the retake decision is ssssoooooo UNFAIR. That isolated case of cheating must not involve those who had sacrificed a lot in taking this November board exam….as far as i know there are corresponding punishment to those who had violated the PRC rules. WHy not make a deeper investigation to the issue and penalized those who had cheated and spare those who had tirelessly reviewed for the board exam…. If this decision will not change….i will not retake the examination. I’ll better take the board exam on May, 2008. BOYCOTT NA YAN!!!!!!
Nov 30th, 2007
Engr. Patrocinio Sepanton
Sana nxt time pahirapan nyo naman yung exam, yung wala dun ang sagot sa tanong ,yung kayo rin mismo hindi nyo masagutan ….para wala ng retake na mangyayari..at hindi na umabot pa sa ganitong sitwasyon..
Bakit? magkano ba yang putang inang p.r.c na yan…
Nov 30th, 2007
Engr. Perfecto Padilla jr.
Sa mga kalaban kong bobong review center ,Besavella ,Review Innovation Expert and Gellisana ,wag kayong mag-alala..ako ang pinuno ng walang kuwentang review center sa padilla .. isa itong panawagan na tayo’y magkaisa upang bilhin at sunogin ang P.R.C…
Nov 30th, 2007
wag mag pa oto!
Guys 75% daw yong yong pumaso.. what if isa kayo sa pumasa tatahimik nalang bah kayo??
makiisa sa lahat listen always to what is planned by all para mapaglaban ang karapatan
Nov 30th, 2007
Ryan
Unfair tlga..kung my retake kelan un? sure na bng sa january 12?
Nov 30th, 2007
Jackie Kell
Crap and Stupid are the only two words that I can say against this decision. I have been waiting for so long for the result that it’s truly getting ridiculously stupid now. I’m here in Australia and I was in shocked when my family member informed me about this CRAP of retesting. First and foremost I would like to know that if you were to do this retake “are you paying for the accommodation, food and find some sort of pay back for the inconvience that you have cause to every single examinee because in my opinion that is one of the thing you can at least do to make up for your mistakes. This act is truly UNACCEPTABLE!
It was clearly said to me that the questions in the Hydraulics and Geotechnical Engineering and Structural Engineering field was truly easy and basic so what do you expect, for sure everyone will be getting good scores. Second thing the security was said to be truly tight that they were asked to take off their socks & shoes, clear their pockets & even their lunches was asked to be turn to pieces and two proctors were roaming around inside the room to make sure everyone is doing the right thing, how could someone have the chance to cheat if they were that strict , unless there’s another side of the story and they are just throwing the dirt to the examinees because they would rather LOOK GOOD and let everyone SUFFER and deal with it because in there minds there is nothing they can do to US!
I am truly disappointed with the PRC they have DISTROYED the credibility of the Filipino engineers and to be engineers in result their chances of getting hired locally or ABROAD will be lessen because they will have doubts on your credibility to do the job on their field and this is truly not fair for every single one of them. This has disappointed me & family in so many levels.
If you have strong evidence of the people who cheated HOPE you would be decent enough to impose this change to the people who cheated only and not to every examinees. In my part YOU have wasted my MONEY and TIME!
Nov 30th, 2007
Liza Limbu
Prc is really a crab mentality. whats wrong if they get a high scores you should be happy of that. Coz high score better chance to find the job for the new Engineer. Talagang Sayang ang mga naghihintay na trabaho dito sa UK, sa ibang nationality na lahat mapupunta kung puro backward ang takbo ng utak ng PRC. Instead that you create them being a credible newly breed engineer ay ginagawa niyo silang tanga at bobo. But be careful coz they are not like you. How many staff of Prc? And how many Engineer your trying to stop for their good future? Only two who cheat not the whole examinees, ibig niyong sabihin kasalan ni Juan damay si Pedro? To all the examinees do what you think is good to protect your right and we in the other Country will support you. Eliminate the bad people on your way.
Dec 1st, 2007
Clarisse
EI, PEOPLE I NEED YOUR FULL ATTENTION.. sana ay wala nang magpopost ng mga hinaing ninyo regarding sa retake annnouncement.. narinig at nabasa ko na lahat and if we just continue to post our lamentations here, wala pong mangyayari and 4 days have already passed, time is not on our side.. SO WE WANT ACTIONS to resolve this issue..kay EAL or sino mang taga-RI or Padi, kindly contact me so i can know the updates..and kung sinuman yung nabalitaan kong nagpasa ng OPEN LETTER sa media, congress and malacanang, please i want to get in touch with you also..and TO ALL THE PERSONS WHO HAVE ENOUGH COURAGE AND WILL to pursue the “NO RETAKE” scenario, we need your cooperation.. walang ibang sinserong gagawa nito kundi tayo ring mga apektadong examinees. of course, we greatly need the guidance and supervision of PICE, review centers and media. I WANT AN ORGANIZED, UNIFIED AND COORDINATED ACTION to settle this issue AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.. baka kasi nagkakaasahan at naghihintayan lang tayo eh tumatakbo na ang oras.. and one last thing, sa mga pabor at walang ginagawa regarding sa retake controversy, magretake man kayo at maging engineer, MGA ENGINEER NAMAN KAYO NA TAKOT IPAGLABAN ANG ALAM MO NAMANG TAMA, MGA ENGINEER KAYO NA WALANG PANININDIGAN, MGA ENGINEER KAYO NA SUNUD-SUNURAN PA REN KAHIT SA KAMALIAN.. mas masarap naman maging engineer na nakikipaglaban at alam ang ating moral obligations na dapat gampanan.. i’ll be joining the “rally” sa monday at 10AM sa harap ng PRC, ang it’s a good start but its not enough.. we need a systematic plan.. my cel # is 09154657632..
Dec 1st, 2007
Chris
I’ll join the rally too.
Count me in!
NO TO RETAKE!
Dec 1st, 2007
GIBSON
RETAKE KUNG RETAKE… ASAP NA DAPAT ANG DECISION…
Dec 1st, 2007
Laban Tayo
The two who cheated is from cdo center but it doesn’t mean that all who took in cdo cheated..
The two who cheated is from two different school ” 1 from MPSC(Mindanao polytechnic state college) and the other one is from URIOS University (Butuan school)”.. Dis students have family names starting with letter C as wat i have herd while taking the exam (may dalawang taong nahuli sa room na ngsisimula sa “C” ang family name..
Guys kami ay nakikiisa sa inyo..
NO TO RETAKE
Ill try to look for the name of the two cheaters and ill post it here as i have their names…
….. Note: Walang Leakage… Walang Leakage … Iba case natin sa nursing
Dec 1st, 2007
Clarisse
yup, it’s a good thng na ang nagcicirculate sa media reports ay IRREGULARITIES ang reason ng retake.. no “leakage” term was associated..SO I WANT TO CLEAR THE ISSUE RE: TWO STUDENTS CAUGHT using CELLPHONE..LABAN TAYO, pls gather some info regarding the incident.. kelan ba nahuli ung cellphone, BEFORE, DURING or AFTER THE EXAM? kasi kung before the exam, LEAKAGE talaga un and retake will progress for sure.. if DURING the exam, anong oras ngyari? baka kasi they’re just comparing and sharing their answers (which i think the real probable reason)..it supports the claim na 21 out of 30 lang ang tama kasi nga ay sagot lang nila un..san ka naman nakakita ng leakage na pampasa lang..so mlakas laban naten pag ganun kasi THESE ARe JusT ACTS of PERSONAL CHEATING..kung after the exam, obviously, wala na silang pakialam dun..any more updates? natuloy ba ung coverage g tv patrol sa RI? bakit di binalita man lang..
Dec 1st, 2007
red
no to retake
im in
Dec 1st, 2007
nonoy
PRC,wala wala gid ah!,.lawlaw.,
Mar 15th, 2008
cool guy
good luck!!!
May 11th, 2008
JeffGibbs
Pasado ako!!!!!!!!!
Jun 24th, 2008
Reply to “November 2007 Civil Engineering Board Exam Invalidated”